Behavioural adaptations are often some of the first to evolve during population divergence, and can play a key role during the evolution of new species. For example, although many organisms can interbreed with close relatives, they often ‘choose’ not to. Our research focuses on sensory and behavioural adaptations: how ecological, genetic and developmental factors influence their evolution, and how they contribute to speciation and other population level processes
We are interested in how sensory and behavioural phenotypes contribute to population divergence and speciation. To address this, we take an interdisciplinary approach, using methods ranging from ecological and behavioural experiments in the tropics, to neuroanatomy and population genomics.
Our work is largely focused on speciation in Heliconiusbutterflies, which show a striking radiation of bright warning patterns across the Neotropics. Closely related taxa often display divergent wing patterns, and because males almost invariably prefer to court females that share their own colour pattern, this contributes to an important pre-mating reproductive barrier between species.
Visual mating preferences.
Organisms often use visual signals to attract and recognise suitable mates. Although the evolution of these cues is increasingly understood at the molecular level, we know little of the genetic and developmental mechanisms underlying variation in the corresponding preferences, or of visually guided behaviours more broadly. Heliconius butterflies are excellent animals to study how visual preference behaviours are generated during development and across evolutionary time.
Our work on visual mating preferences addresses four major questions:
1) How do visual preferences contribute to the evolution of reproductive isolation, and what is the role of genetic architecture and ecology? 2) How do visual preferences interact with other sensory modalities? 3) How is behavioural variation encoded in the genome, and how have preference and colour pattern genes co-evolved across the group? And finally, 4) how are mating preferences mediated through changes in the neural and sensory systems?
Rossi, M., Hausmann, A.E., Alcami, P., Möst, M., Wright, D.S., Kuo, C.-Y., Lozano-Urrego, D., Maulana, A., Melo-Flórez, L., Rueda-Muñoz G., McMahon, S., Linares, M., McMillan, O., Pardo-Diaz, C., Salazar, C. & Merrill, R.M. (2024) Adaptive introgression of a visual preference gene.Science 383: 1368-1378
The compound eyes of insects consist of numerous independent photosensitive units, ommatidia, each of which receives light information and transfers it to the brain. Variation in insect eye size can directly affect visual perception. We have been investigating how eye size varies both within and between related Heliconius species. In particular, our recent results suggest that this variation is driven by divergent selection, and that it relates to visual acuity (i.e. the ability to perceive detail in a visual scene. We are currently further leveraging the Heliconius system to better understand the evolutionary genetics and development of variation in insect eye size, and also plan to expand these analyses across butterflies.
Selection should favour divergent sensory phenotypes in populations exposed to different sensory conditions. This can generate reproductive isolation either by affecting mate choice, or through reduced fitness of poorly adapted immigrants and/or hybrids. Despite the central role of the brain in modulating sensitivity or integration of stimuli, existing speciation studies have focussed on the sensory periphery. Alongside our collaborators at the University of Bristol, we are combining comparisons of neuroanatomy, gene expression and behaviour between recently diverged Heliconius species and their hybrids, with broader scale comparative analyses to address four broad questions: 1) Are changes in neural investment driven by ecological selection? 2) How do these changes relate to shifts in sensory behaviours?3) To what extent have different neural and sensory traits coevolved, and is their evolution constrained by developmental and/or fitness trade-offs? And, 4) what is the genetic architecture, and ultimately the specific genetic changes, underlying shifts in neural adaptation?
We have recently started a collaboration with Jonna Kulmuni to study adaptation, speciation and hybridisation in Formica ssp. wood ants in the Alps. Our main field site for this project is a little more than an hour by train from our department in Munich (a very different situation to ‘our’ Neotropical butterflies). Species normally only found in the north of Europe are present at higher elevations in this region, allowing us to explore how these populations have diverged from closely related ‘southern’ lower elevation species. We plan to compare these populations with those in Finland, where these species are known to hybridise.